10 questions for presidents

1.   How can an office of law preside over laws allowing the killing of animals?

2.  What is an acceptable limit, if any, of the alotment of the environment for human use?

3.  What is the right of the value of the continuity of non-human species?

4.  What is the value of human cultures and understanding regarding ignorance and/or denial of the sacred as it pertains to good-will and indifference to life as sacred?

5.  In terms of overstepping the freedom of free ambition of all life as equal, how does respect for the quality of life influence limits of ambition as a survival mechanism?

6.  How has ambition superceded understanding as a quality of the positive quality of ambition, or lack thereof, in terms of exploration and reward?

7.  What is the measure of tenderness regarding prioritization opposing the compression of the directive of consciousness?

8.  Is the endeavor of a species regarding its benefit including as a need as a part of the whole sustainable as a denied rational, moral justification of such, in terms of its self-interest, that being the very moral purpose of being, as secure (not continuing in error), and individuated freely, subject to enforced co-existence on a plane as fair to granted rights, and does physical existence pertain to moral power irrespective of physical power, if random transformation requires the real purpose of self-recognition for any kinder sense than mere existence?  (Answer:  that is the reason for happiness)

9.  What is each individual member's of every species recognizable reality as the benevolence of the reality of its existence, and can it be unfairly separated from that?

(Answer:  the universe;  DO NOT consider that to mean anything other than infinitely separated fate within destruction IN ANY SENSE which considers that negative to that destruction, as other than the truth of the value of the truth of the order of higher possibility to higher possibility [which would successfully include the fair, responsible infinite of love, opened towards others as there being a future with its part, - and that I wasn't going to say, because it was obvious to me, that any love ought to have been recognizable to any infinite only part of faith as other than the competing rewards of evil] if it needs to be said, although the level of facilitating evil is at this time being upheld pragmatically as a negation of all truth to creation by the ultimate outcome of denying the simple place of simpler individual respect which can be adequately explained to any purpose other than an ultimate change to evil, with all powers under that concomitantly with purposeless power as considered thought)

10.  And finally, from the 7:  How does vain feeling describe moral order as prioritization of self-concerns confused with the safe true scientifically conscious nature of being between simply free within trust and active in a guaranteed effective, legal measure?  7777 *<< What other than love can describe a reasonable complexity of an issue of so many kinds of individuals? >>* 7777  What qualities and conditions of people and other creatures weighs on a leader pertaining to a cross dynamic of causes involving enforcement of any power as hostile or rewarding to natures between separate and complete as antagonistic, and omniscient and indivisible and between sensible as free and completely indifferent as a proportion to the misuse of an irrational quality of likes and dislikes attacking the sense and timing of better lives - and how does purity relate to character regarding the denial of a necessary consideration - and how important is it, to purity and Ernie and Bert?