The reality of consciousness, as opposed to its power and respects as interest

It's true that, as savior, I could never backtrack on the cost - of living itself - , referring to sympathy (or more accurately the parameters of truth which i know to be good beyond a right and with more than witnessing being the interest) as understanding (that of rights being equal), but the governance of that as opposed to living as applied is a concept of the prior age, like the price of sin permanently existing before that, not the spirit and nature of an acceptance as joy and good-will, even beyond personal in everyone, in a communist directive and warmth, though usually simpler in context freely and culturally, allowing for individuality, and requiring teaching or at least creative measurement where no purpose stewards.

8's, the people of the new day as it was, are not like 7's, who were effective value holders and reasoners.  But the intellectual directive can give way to a joke, an indulgence or slack or even a more dangerous greater strategy as a throwback.  How they can avoid perceiving myself in that known as unknown context, as the savior, who understood consciousness as the truth not just as freedom (/good-will = love) like a discomfort that is not simply integrated, thereby rendering them past the values of 5's and 4's, as use-cost and cutthroat energies, describable personally like one category of taboo from independence as their own inadequate light of ever but development as a course, is tragic in that being the first and last possibility of good not denied from seeing universalism as beholden to the task of trust (it seems peculiar to a world before our own that our kindness accurately verifies with trust, threatening entire shadow empires' purposes, and therefore also ours as immobile and with no greater willingness or defense upon a softening landscape of technology, if that should resonate with anyone).  They now have to spend at least another eon - probably endless ones rescuing few from the quality of hell, at the very least eternally as a never again escapable risk of sins.  Nothing will be secure, and they have no idea how fast and permanent the cutoff as indescribably and suddenly more evil than any of them fathom that without any point in trust, of forever evil, they are at risk from.

the grace of a savior is not definable equal to social grace, nor his radicalism, to theirs, nor his timing or existence as unperceived.  The next age will have to overcome an untold number of people being stuck in the confounding falsehood of an excuse at the simplest knowledge or its scope, not the harder task of not being able to defend idealism, except as liberally and faslely indulged as an ongoing inequality of construct's power except as determined searching, joining hell.

I always take into account defending men and everyone else as potentially gay and mis-recognized and for everything else in a total completeness, to free justice and its plan (from needing recognition) as natures of better as love('s power) anyways, completely real true context (lives).