Pop Keyword

This should help:

4.

4 1/2.

5.  equalizing, corrupt, painful

5 1/2.  cold, acquisitive, cutthroat - King Midas was this in his infinite love when he was god.

5 3/4.  proud, immediate, branding - Lucifer was this in his infinite love when he was god.

6.  touchy, proper, lawful - God was this in his infinite love as god. [policy;  only one man, our leader, is better than this]

6 1/2.  dignified, rational, applied [policy;  interests are splintered in an effective defense]

7.  sociable, easy going, kind [policy;  One World, united, includes the freedom to explore]

8.  loving, compassionate, gentle [policy;  a mystical wisdom includes more than any individual's retreat]

9.  sweet, amazing, giving [you might, like, want to grow back, in the process matching physical!! time, a normal relevant sensibility about the cause of justice through actual (female) friends' kindness? accordingly actually to the possibility of being that publicly for all people, too, tv!)

10.  pure, omniscient, eternal - I am this, and I am also god in my turn, of day 8, just beginning.

Personal note about Achilles' heals:

Unimaginable torture, persecution, and hate would seem to have targeted the weakest vulnerability, surprise, as uninformed in any understanding tolerably within or through to the day above ours -  or availability, although i also had nothing, and was un un unimaginably treated less than adorably, let alone in what countless lists could explain.

Note about sharing information safely:

There's no foundation for a recognized basis of respect for interests despite each level's intended expansion receiving guidance in the form of persons, longer than exaggerating otherwise as a universal guess.  That is a rational, too kind explanation.  Probably too rational, too.  Technically levels 9 & 10 are open to revelations.  Below level 7, trust, if perfect even there, a great reason to develop it, would be intertwined with methodical ambitions.

Assertive values of levels 5 1/2 & 5 3/4 as commonly recognized, can easily govern better than levels 6, 6 1/2 - as the rights of persons, to the extent disorder and lawlessness are prevalent.

In these levels, women's grace is seen as free, one way, up, although a feminine savior would be confused in thinking she doesn't have the (grace as its clearest limitation is at levels 6 & 6 1/2) qualities of race*, and character, joy, and reassurance as true love to match humility, or suspecting that, as a foundation for incredible enabling wonders.  *it doesn't mean branding, or touchy, counter equality, or dignity to be balanced, or stupid, though it could;  but not stated, as human, which goes as high as applicable up to spending all of infinite in opposition to branding as forms of cruelty if that's what someone chooses to control people in a personal cult of submission as, beneath as in error to law.

Slavery is justifiable (I wouldn't want to sin by delaying any surprise) above costs as only applied, not that that is relevant in the modern world.  But it is morally cutthroat as opposed to branding unlike proper gender roles.  My focus on slavery is in response to the breakdown of lawfulness under hell, as opposed to the virtues of level 5 (which is purgatory), as less overreaching in ill-will for its own existence.  As a fair person, with moral virtues, i was not in the least of least ways respected in any humanity to me, wasting far more intelligent purposes of mine, dooming existence but to the lowest levels (of hell) as a far, far greater risk, to better people.  It is my justified personal interest, without affecting the level i am at to be pro-slavery as any proper to human nature ease up to understanding (however my feminine nature and body although having been cruelly altered and crushed mentally, too, does not contain in my intellect as kinetic as masculine in my perfection as gay/feminine as the savior, the presence of that;  ah, ah, never would let anyone brand a cow, never asked to mix music with muck as the most humble feminine person who ever lived out of synch in the need for friendship and love - still working on that).  I am not pro-slavery.  Lesser natures do not offer waste of up to all things eternally as a moral defense automatically and above where it is the only issue of ever moving on and considering all but the lowest contraction to ill-will.  Trust is automatic at level 7 and above, and anything less than that can describe negative states of exploitation.  In other words, don't become an evil lawyer.  Seriously, if you aren't able to figure out a permanent state above competitiveness, like day 7, you have no business thinking you are accountable to or as a kind of moral authority other than a destroyer of lesser races to that state.  It's only gay.  It just works out that way.

Do not indulge in indulgence itself at level 5 3/4, eventually paid by women* as a nightmare materialized for their people's worst fears/risks (i told you, it's only gay).  This level's qualities includes a lack of secretiveness, that's what branding means, denying transsexuals, and it is the base level of the form of men as feminine, which is why someone here might be characterizable as hating them so much.  *Why not men?  Men won't stoop to being caught as weaker in management, assuring any pragmatic hope.  People could make the mistake of applying immediacy where a polar distinct strength as pride more than only is the correction.  This level would be wise to exploit level 5 1/2, as branding a more struggling group rather than challenge the application of sharing that  level's human cruelty, for all lower level's beneath level 5's corruption, as a much broader connection to the catacombs of all hell.  - except the sense of branding a a struggling group only means monetarily as applied more as pride (what is glory as appropriate desired allowance) - it's not at the level of lawful freedom.  It would and should have to pay literally everything it ever inflicted and all derivative costs (100 times) in the cruelest cases up to the applied level minus rights.

A leader made the same mistake (an inappropriately obstinate - and well-deserved remark?, but that's level 9) for making god that cold in the defense of any felt or at all good sense of willingness bent to power other than inevitably stoking women's interests at much higher levels.  That would be obstinate.  I agitated for the facilitation of love and will continue to as the more pleasing nature as the eighth day begins, rather than the accountably recognizable false indulgence in constant abuse of someone or the society, for having a much higher understanding as any right of theirs.

More on contracting to ill-will;

A lower justification doesn't have the authority to be a separate right, ipso facto that in truth better understood, it isn't true.  So it would tend to justify only the evil around everywhere, leaving only an unattainable, even like fallen, concept, but one not decipherable to even an unborn age granting evil a head start and forgiving times of torment's purpose.  This suggest there would be unimaginable lack of consideration for the not yet born, bringing lesser mundane evil incapacity to match otherwise, eventually.  Post-grace only, imperfection can escape childhood.  A "defense" before times would likely do harm.  Sabotaging a lesser plane's history of tragedies is not fair to successful healing in cycles that escaped them.  Law economy is in my estimation a bad thing.

Having said that, beware level 5, the deceptive opposite of setting up considerations for its own ill-will, where fundamentalism is an equalizing threat to level 6 1/2, and also a diversion from 5 1/2, as the point of nothingness, but to the doctrine of harsh order least applying thought.

Codified law addresses existence's purpose, bypassing conflict.  What is conflict under the law?  The interests of free existence not to the discriminatory perfection of expressible nature as the only safeguard not of persons but of intrusiveness, which is what is used to enable unfair or immoral judgement and attacks, including bound effects as contrary to law and freedom, a once unfathomable characteristic of civilized societies' continuing willingness to learn.